Home → Releases → № 3 (41) →

GENESIS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT ABOUT THE COMPONENTS OF THE DEFINITION OF “HUMAN WELL-BEING”

Domestic and Foreign Experience of Management , UDC: 336.01

Authors

  • Kuzubov Alexey Alexeyevich PhD in Economics, Associate Professor
  • Maksimenko Aleksandr Nikolaevich PhD in Economics, Associate Professor
  • Malinina Olga Yurievna PhD in Economics, Associate Professor

Annotation

The article analyzes and systematizes the scientific views of economists of classical and neoclassical periods on the definition of the concept of welfare and factors affecting it. The purpose of this study is to highlight the peculiarities of the modern approach to the definition of welfare components, as well as to interpret the author’s approach to the definition of factors affecting the welfare of people and society as a whole in the conditions of situational uncertainty and actual transformations of modern realities. The author’s schematic three-level approach to the most relevant modern definition of the components of human well-being is developed and proposed, which includes: basic or material level of well-being, average or psychological-emotional level, higher or spiritual level.
Tags:
alternative indicators of well-being , Economic development , human development index , Quality of life , standard of living , welfare factors

How to link insert

Kuzubov, A. A., Maksimenko, A. N. & Malinina, O. Y. (2024). GENESIS OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT ABOUT THE COMPONENTS OF THE DEFINITION OF “HUMAN WELL-BEING” Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 3 (41),
References
1. 1. Ivankina L., Latygovskaya T. Modern Social Welfare in the Light of the Sustainability Model // Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. Vol. 166. , P. 111–115. ISSN 1877-0428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.493.
2. 2. Nanni P. “Well-Being” before “Welfare society”: Historical Realities and Language // Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2016. Vol. 8. P. 755–761. ISSN 2210-7843. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.062
3. 3. Shirokikh Yu. А. Influence of national projects on the solution of key problems of social character in the Russian Federation // Actual scientific research in the modern world. 2021. № 12–6 (80). P. 90–93.
4. 4. Pigou A. Economic theory of welfare: Translate with Englich. Vol. 1. Moscow: Progress, 1985. 511 p.
5. 5. Lebedeva M. В. Subjective and psychological well-being as categories of modern psychology // 2021. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology. Т. 4. № 5. P. 48–52.
6. 6. Kuzmenko S. В. Human capital and socio-cultural environment of modern Russia // Humanities and socio-economic sciences. 2021. № 1 (116). P. 19–24. DOI: 10.18522/1997-2377-2021-116-1-19-24.
7. 7. Popov V. Soviet economic reforms: Possible difficulties in the application of public choice theory // Journal of Comparative Economics. 1991. Vol. 15. Issue 2. P. 304–324. DOI: 10.1016/0147-5967(91)90091-7.
8. 8. Stremousova E. G. Demand for basic provisions of economic theory in special economic education // Theory and practice of world science. 2022. № 9. P. 2–6.
9. 9. Been J., van Ewijk C., Knoef M., Mehlkopf R., Muns S. Households’ heterogeneous welfare effects of using home equity for life cycle consumption // The Journal of the Economics of Ageing. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2023.100499; URL: https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/3717124
10. 10. Lavrentieva I. V. Perspective methods for assessing the well-being and quality of life of the population of the world’s regions // Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2021. № 12 (458). С. 118–124. DOI: 10.47475/1994-2796-2021-11213
11. 11. Ochilova D. A. GDP as an indicator of public welfare // International Student Scientific Bulletin. 2020. № 1. Р. 37.
12. 12. Belikova S. В. Conceptual approaches to the study of economic choice of an economic entity // Bulletin of Eurasian science. 2020. Vol. 12. № 6.
13. 13. Bychkova N. E. Analyzing the dependence of GDP and MIS (international happiness index) // System analysis and analytics. 2019. № 1 (9). Р. 23–28.
14. 14. Arndt C., Mahrt K., Hussain M. A., Tarp F. A human rights-consistent approach to multidimensional welfare measurement applied to sub-Saharan Africa // World Development. 2018. Vol. 108. P. 181–196. ISSN 0305-750X. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.022
15. 15. Bezyazyazychny V. F. Methodology for assessing the quality of human life on the basis of the process approach to management // Quality and Life. 2019. № 1 (21). Р. 16–21.
16. 16. Ustenko V. S. Economy of “their own” and “strangers”: the role of ethical system in economic development // Alter Economics. 2023. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 348–375. DOI: 10.31063
17. 17. Guchmazova D. A. The concept of state regulation of income of the population in the aspect of growth of welfare of the society // Collection of scientific papers of the series “Economics”. 2022. № 26. P. 17–26. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6912803
18. 18. Volkovitskaya G. А. Human development index as a basis for determining the social characteristics of labor activity // Actual problems of economics and management. 2021. № 3 (31). P. 24–33.
19. 19. Savina E. I. Statistics of components of the human capital index in the world // Meridian scientific electronic journal. 2019. № 7(25). P. 79–80.
Download file .pdf 542.86 kb