Home → Releases → 2023 №2 (36) →

CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE SYSTEM FOR SUBSTANTIATING OPTIONS FOR CREATING COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS IN MODERN ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

Domestic and Foreign Experience of Management , UDC: 336.5 DOI: 10.25688/2312-6647.2023.36.2.10

Authors

  • Gudkov Boris Nikolaevich Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Annotation

The article considers an up-to-date approach to the construction of a conceptual model that allows on its basis to analyze possible options for creating technical systems, primarily necessary for the effective development of the economic system. As a result of the analysis of scientifically based methods existing in this field, it is concluded that today the issue of developing a methodological apparatus that allows objectively considering and accepting technical systems for creation and subsequent production is relevant. Moreover, the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of future systems in the proposed approach are taken based on the objective capabilities of economic entities. In addition, the article considers an important issue of resource (primarily financial) feasibility of creating samples of complex technical systems. A special aspect of the presented conceptual model is its universality in relation to any sphere that includes functionally integrated complex technical systems.
Tags:
criteria for the effectiveness of complex technical systems , development and production , feasibility study , forecast of economic development conditions , justification of quantitative and qualitative characteristics , scientific and technical feasibility. , the qualities of the created sample

How to link insert

Gudkov, B. N. (2023). CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE SYSTEM FOR SUBSTANTIATING OPTIONS FOR CREATING COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEMS IN MODERN ECONOMIC CONDITIONS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2023 №2 (36), 119. https://doi.org/10.25688/2312-6647.2023.36.2.10
References
1. 1. Kalyuzhny`j K. A. Sostoyanie i perspektivy` importozameshheniya v rossijskoj ITotrasli [The state and prospects of import substitution in the Russian IT industry] // Upravlenie naukoj i naukometriya. [Management of science and scientometrics. Scientific journal]. 2016. T. 11. Vy`p. 2. S. 85–103.
2. 2. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po ocenke e`ffektivnosti investicionny`x proektov. Utverzhdeny` Ministerstvom e`konomiki RF, Ministerstvom finansov RF, Gosudarstvenny`m komitetom RF po stroitel`noj, arxitekturnoj i zhilishhnoj politike 21.06.1999 № VK477 [Methodological recommendations for evaluating the effectiveness of investment projects. Approved by the Ministry of Economy of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Construction, Architecture and Housing Policy 21.06.1999 № VK477] [Electronic resourse] // E`lektronny`j fond pravovy`x i normativnotexnicheskix dokumentov. [Electronic fund of legal and regulatory documents]. URL: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200005634?marker=64U0IK&section=text# (accessed: 01.02.2022).
3. 3. Mustaeva I. Z., Maksimova N. K., Mustaeva T. I. Upravlenie proektami sozdaniya texnicheski slozhny`x izdelij, baziruyushheesya na ispol`zovanii sociofizicheskix modelej [Project management for the creation of technically complex products based on the use of socio-physical models] // Voprosy` upravleniya. [Management issues]. 2020. № 5 (66). S. 71–86.
4. 4. Enkel E., Perez-Freije J., Gassmann O. Minimizing market risks through customer integration in new product development: Learning from bad practice, Creativity and Innovation Management. 2005. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 425–437.
5. 5. Ivanov S. V. Sovremenny`e tendencii v oblasti assortimentnoj politiki krupnejshix IT-kompanij [Modern trends in the assortment policy of the largest IT companies] // Rossijskoe predprinimatel`stvo. [Russian Entrepreneurship]. 2008. № 9 (2). S. 112–114.
6. 6. Orlov A. I. Organizacionno-e`konomicheskoe obespechenie innovacionnoj deyatel`nosti v raketno-kosmicheskoj otrasli [Organizational and economic support of innovation activities in the rocket and space industry] // Politematicheskij setevoj e`lektronny`j nauchny`j zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. [Polythematic online electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University]. 2014. № 102. S. 112–143.
7. 7. Xrustalev E. Yu., Slavyanov A. S., Saxarov I. E. Metody` i instrumentarij vy`bora mexanizmov e`konomicheskoj zashhity` naukoemkix proizvodstv na primere raketnokosmicheskoj promy`shlennosti [Methods and tools for choosing mechanisms of economic protection of high-tech industries on the example of the rocket and space industry] // E`konomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika. [Economic analysis: theory and practice]. 2013. № 30 (333). S. 2–11.
8. 8. Anisimov S. N., Kolobov A. A., Omel`chenko I. N., Orlov A. I., Ivanilova A. M., Krasnov S. V. Proektirovanie integrirovanny`x proizvodstvenno-korporativny`x struktur: e`ffektivnost`, organizaciya, upravlenie [Design of integrated production and corporate structures: efficiency, organization, management]: monografiya. M.: Izd-vo MGTU im. N. E`. Baumana, 2006. 728 s.
9. 9. Chursin A. A., Rusinov A. A., Volkov V. A. Ocenka riskov ustojchivogo razvitiya vy`sokotexnologichny`x oblastej promy`shlennosti pri vnedrenii innovacionny`x texnologij [Risk assessment of sustainable development of high-tech industries in the implementation of innovative technologies] // E`konomika i upravlenie v mashinostroenii. [Economics and management in mechanical engineering]. 2012. № 1. S. 25–29.
Download file .pdf 378.47 kb