Authors
- Savenkov Leonid Dmitrievich PhD in Economics
Annotation
The article is devoted to the analysis of sustainable development risks of companies in the steel industry. The paper analyzes the countries where companies with the most
effective management of sustainability risks in the steel industry are located. Australia, Canada, India, as well as countries in Europe and Asia are considered. The focus is on regulatory environment, level of sustainability risk, market capitalization and steel production volume. Key differences in sustainability approaches and their impact on the global competitiveness of companies are identified. The analysis shows that steel companies in Australia and Canada stand out for their high level of sustainability risk management due to clear regulatory requirements and high standards of corporate governance. European countries are characterized by formalized regulations, which contributes to more stable sustainability management, unlike Asian countries, where social and environmental issues dominate. Steel companies in countries with high steel production, such as the US, Brazil and Japan, need to increase their focus on sustainability risk management to remain competitive.
How to link insert
Savenkov, L. D. (2025). SUSTAINABILITY RISK MANAGEMENT BY FOREIGN METALLURGICAL ENTERPRISES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (43), 34. https://doi.org/10.24412/2312-6647-2025-143-34-42
References
1.
1. Combining ESG Risk Ratings and Fundamentals of Companies for Better Investing / H. Sunelwala [et al.] // J. Commer. Account. Res. 2022. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 18.
2.
2. Giese G., Nagy Z., Lee L. E. Deconstructing ESG ratings performance: Risk and return for E, S, and G by time horizon, sector, and weighting // J. Portf. Manag. 2021. Vol. 47. № 3. P. 94–111. DOI: 10.3905/JPM.2020.1.198
3.
3. Luo D., Yan J., Yan Q. The duality of ESG: Impact of ratings and disagreement on stock crash risk in China // Financ. Res. Lett. 2023. № 58. P. 104479. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104479
4.
4. Li S., Yin P., Liu S. Evaluation of ESG Ratings for Chinese Listed Companies From the Perspective of Stock Price Crash Risk // Front. Environ. Sci. 2022. № 10. P. 933639. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.933639
5.
5. Liang Y., Xue C., Zhang J. The Impact of ESG Ratings on Stock Liquidity Risk: Evidence from the Chinese Market // Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 2022. Vol. 12. № 4. P. 1–16. DOI: 10.58745/riber_12-4_1-16
6.
6. Champagne C., Coggins F., Sodjahin A. Can extra-financial ratings serve as an indicator of ESG risk? // Glob. Financ. J. 2022. № 54. P. 100638. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100638
7.
7. Eratalay M. H., Ángel A. P. C. The Impact of ESG Ratings on the Systemic Risk of European Blue-Chip Firms // J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2022. Vol. 15. № 4. P. 153. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15040153
8.
8. ESG rating and financial risk of mining industry companies / C. Fu [et al.] // Resour. Policy. 2024. № 88. P. 1043085. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104308
9.
9. Zhang J., De Spiegeleer J., Schoutens W. Implied tail risk and ESG ratings // Mathematics. 2021. Vol. 9. № 14. P. 1611. DOI: 10.3390/math9141611
10.
10. Kim M. G., Sung Kim K., Lee K. C. Analyzing the Effects of Topics Underlying Companies’ Financial Disclosures about Risk Factors on Prediction of ESG Risk Ratings: Emphasis on BERTopic // Proceedings – 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2022. 2022. DOI: 10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10021110
11.
11. The ESG Risk Ratings / S. Von Münchhausen [et al.] // Morningstar Sustain. 2024. P. 1–23.