Authors
- Ishbaev Zulfat Zufarovich
- Abramov Ruslan Agarunovich Doctor of Economics, Professor
Annotation
The purpose of this article is to study strategic planning, which is not applied in educational organizations which are subordinated to the Department of Education and Science of Moscow. The lack of appropriate strategic planning leads to the problems of effective function. The results of this article may be useful for heads of educational organizations, where internal processes are examined against strategies. In addition, the results show the advantages of using The Balanced Scorecard in strategic planning as a tool for solving problems of the education process. Also, the article shows the possibility of applying this system to increase the effective activity of the educational organization.
How to link insert
Ishbaev, Z. Z. & Abramov, R. A. (2022). IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BALANCED SCORECARD IN THE PLANNED ACTIVITIES OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF MOSCOW Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2022 №3 (33), 66. https://doi.org/10.25688/2312-6647.2022.33.3.6
References
1.
1. Resolution of the Government of Moscow, 2011, September 27, № 450-PP «On approval of the State Program of the city of Moscow «Development of Education of the City of Moscow («Capital Education»)» (with changes and additions) // ConsultantPlus.
2.
2. Zhurakovskaya V. M., Olicheva O. A. Management of the portfolio of projects in the educational organization // Bulletin of Samara State Technical University. Series «Psychology and pedagogical sciences». 2021. Vol. 18 (2). P. 87–100. DOI: 10.17673/vsgtupps.2021.2.2.7
3.
3. Kazakova N. A. Economic analysis. Textbook. M.: INFRA-M, 2019. 343 p. + CD-R. (Higher education).
4.
4. Karminskiy A. M., Sosurko B. B. Comparative analysis of models of rating formation [Electronic resourse] // Financial analytics: problems and solutions. 2010. № 14. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelny-analiz-modeley-formirovaniya-reytingov (accessed: 11.04.2022).
5.
5. Rating of Moscow schools’ contribution to quality education of Moscow schoolchildren [Electronic resourse] // Methodology 2021/22. URL: https:///school.moscow/rating (accessed: 14.04.2022).
6.
6. Resnik G. A., Kurdova M. A. Balanced scorecard as a method of assessing the sustainability of the university // Management in social and economic systems. Sat. Art. VI Mezhunar Nauch. Prakt. Konf. / under Ed. S. D. Reznika. Penza : Izd-vo Penz. pp. h. h. acad., 2014. P. 151–154.
7.
7. Fedorova E. P., Boeva K. V. Experience of introduction of balanced scorecard in educational institutions // Baikal Research Journal. 2016. T. 7. № 6. DOI: 10.17150/2411-6262.2016.7(6).14
8.
8. Shemintikhina L. Y., Lagutina E. E. Management and Economics of Education: Teaching Manual. Rostov-n/D: Phoenix, 2015. 430 p. (Higher education)
9.
9. Patro A. Using Balance scorecard in Educational institutions // International Journal of Business and Management Invention. ISSN (Online): 2319–8028, ISSN (Print): 2319–801X. Vol. 5. Iss. 11. November. 2016. P. 70–77. URL: http://www.ijbmi.org
10.
10. Fijałkowska J., Oliveira C. Balanced Scorecard in Universities // Journal of Intercultural Management. 2018. № 10 (4). P. 57–83. DOI: 10.2478/joim-2018-0025
11.
11. Kaplan R., Norton D. Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review. 1996 [Electronic resourse]. URL: https://www.strimgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/KaplanNorton_Linking-the-BSC-to-Strategy.pdf (accessed: 12.04.2022).
12.
12. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The strategyfocused organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press, 2001. P. 400.