Authors
- Kurilova Anastasia Alexandrovna Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor
- Borgardt Alexander Alexandrovich
Annotation
The paper assesses the digitalization of organizations in the Siberian Federal District of Russia based on principal component analysis (PCA) from 2010 to 2022. The results show significant digital diversity in the 10 regions of the district and are indicative of the process of convergence over time between them. The ranking of the regions of the Siberian Federal District for 2022 has changed significantly compared to 2010. Several regions showed a sharp improvement, which indicates the positive dynamics of digitalization in the district. The analysis of the most optimal number of clusters using Dunn’s method showed that the best number of clusters is four. This allows us to identify groups of regions with similar indicators and characteristics, which can be useful for further analysis and development of targeted strategies to increase the level of digitalization in the Siberian Federal District. Thus, the changes in the ratings and the results of cluster analysis emphasize the dynamism of the digital transformation process in the regions, which opens up new
opportunities for development and cooperation on this path. The article contributes to the existing literature on digital well-being and regional development by offering new approaches and recommendations for improving digital performance in organizations.
How to link insert
Kurilova, A. A. & Borgardt, A. A. (2025). DIGITALIZATION OF ORGANIZATIONS IN THE SIBERIAN FEDERAL DISTRICT OF RUSSIA Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (44), 61. https://doi.org/10.24412/2312-6647-2025-244-61-75
References
1.
1. Keles E. U., Alptekin G. I. Evaluation of the digitalization efficiency of countries using data envelopment analysis // 2023 Smart Cities Symposium Prague, SCSP 2023. 2023. Р. 1–5.
2.
2. Wang J., Xu Y. Digitalization, income inequality, and public health: Evidence from developing countries // Technol. Soc. 2023. № 73. Р. 102210.
3.
3. Digitalization of financial services in European countries: Evaluation and comparative analysis / O. Pakhnenko et al. // J. Int. Stud. 2021. Vol. 14. № 2. Р. 267–282.
4.
4. Senna P. P., Bonnin Roca J., Barros A. C. Overcoming barriers to manufacturing digitalization: Policies across EU countries // Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2023. № 196. Р. 122822.
5.
5. Nguyen V. B. The role of digitalization in the FDI — income inequality relationship in developed and developing countries // J. Econ. Financ. Adm. Sci. 2023. Vol. 28. № 55. Р. 6–26.
6.
6. Too good to be true: The inverted U-shaped relationship between home-country digitalization and environmental performance / G. Ahmadova et al. // Ecol. Econ. 2022. № 196. Р. 107393.
7.
7. The digitalization phenomenon and digital strategies in emerging countries: A semi-systematic review / P. Leão et al. // Revista de Administracao Mackenzie. 2023. Vol. 24. № 3. Р. 1–32.
8.
8. Mia M. A., Hossain M. I., Sangwan S. Determinants of digitalization: Evidence from Asia and the Pacific countries // Digit. Transform. Soc. 2024. Р. 340–358.
9.
9. Cross-country differences in European firms’ digitalisation: the role of national culture / M. Rubino et al. // Manag. Decis. 2020. Vol. 58. № 8. Р. 1563–1583.
10.
10. Yin Z. H., Choi C. H. Does digitalization contribute to lesser income inequality? Evidence from G20 countries // Inf. Technol. Dev. 2023. Vol. 29. № 1. Р. 61–82.
11.
11. State support for the digitalization of SMEs in European countries / V. Strilets et al. // Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2022. Vol. 20. № 4. Р. 290–305.
12.
12. Vasileva I., Morozova N. The potential of industry digitalization for improving environmental situation in the Russian regions // E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. № 258. Р. 0401.
13.
13. Model of state support for the digital transformation of the manufactu ring industry in Russian regions / A. Tanina et al. // Int. J. Technol. 2022. Vol. 13. № 7. Р. 1538–1547.
14.
14. Chernenko I., Kelchevskaya N., Pelymskaya I. Digital intellectual capital of Russian companies and its impact on financial and innovation performance // SHS Web Conf. 2021. № 93. Р. 1–13.
15.
15. Glebova I. S., Anisheva Y. A., Gorelova J. N. Digitalization impact on social and economic development of territory (Russian regions) // J. Adv. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2020. Vol. 10. № 3. Р. 214–219.
16.
16. Digital technologies in arctic oil and gas resources extrac tion: global trends and Russian experience / E. Samylovskaya et al. // Resources. 2022. Vol. 11. № 3. Р. 1–30.
17.
17. Zaborovskaia O., Nadezhina O., Avduevskaya E. The impact of digitalization on the formation of human capital at the regional level // J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020. Vol. 6. № 4. Р. 1–24.
18.
18. Dolganova I. Sustainable development: Specifics of primary and secondary digitalisation in depressed regions (on example of the Russian Federation) // E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. № 462. Р. 1–13.
19.
19. The Interrelation between digital and tax components of sustai nable regional development / N. Victorova et al. // Int. J. Technol. 2021. Vol. 12. № 7. Р. 1508–1517.
20.
20. Untura G. A. The Knowledge economy and digitalization: assessing the impact on economic growth of Russian regions // Reg. Res. Russ. 2023. Vol. 13. № 3. Р. 397–406.
21.
21. Assessment of the Level of Digitalization of Russian Regions Under Conditions of Socio-economic Uncertainty / N. M. Fomenko et al. // Environmental Footprints and Eco-Design of Products and Processes. 2023. Р. 461–472.
22.
22. The ‘Digitalisation trap’ of Russian regions / A. S. Molchan et al. // Int. J. Technol. Policy Manag. 2023. Vol. 23. № 1. Р. 20–41.
23.
23. Stuken T., Lapina T., Korzhova O. Features of digitalization of Russian regions // E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. № 403. Р. 1–7.