Authors
- Elkin Stanislav Evgenievich Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor
- Elkina Olga Sergeevna Doctor of Economics, Professor
Annotation
The main area of research is the connections and interrelations between managerial and technological innovations. The aim is to determine the mutual influence of organizational and technological innovations on each other. Research methods. The study was conducted on the basis of an empirical sociological study and on the average data of organizations included in the IMOEX index. Based on the conducted research, the following results were obtained. Firstly, the introduction of new technological innovations can stimulate organizational changes in the structure of the company. Secondly, the introduction of new management methods is likely to lead to more active implementation of new processes, but this is not enough to stimulate the development of new or significantly improved products. Limitations of the study. Various types of innovations have been studied, with the exception of such forms of non-technological innovations as marketing innovations. The analysis of the interaction between marketing and technological innovations remained outside the scope of the study. Recommendations. The main recommendation is to introduce
new organizational methods in the field of workplace organization and external relations, as well as to carry out managerial transformations to increase the innovative potential of the organization.
How to link insert
Elkin, S. E. & Elkina, O. S. (2024). MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THEIR MUTUAL INFLUENCE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 3 (41),
References
1.
1. Mairesse J., Mohnen P. The importance of R&D for innovation: A reassessment using French survey data // Journal of Technology Transfer. 2005. № 30 (1/2). Р. 183–197.
2.
2. Weerawardena J. The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy // Journal of Strategic Marketing. 2003. № 11 (1). 15–35.
3.
3. OECD. The measurement of scientific and technological activities Oslo Manual. In Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd edn. Paris: OECD EUROSTAT, 2005. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271847393_OSLO_Manual_Guidelines_for_Collecting_and_Interpreting_Innovation_Data
4.
4. Chetty S. K., Stangl L. M. Internationalization and innovation in a network relationship context // European Journal of Marketing. 2010. № 44 (11/12). Р. 1725–1743.
5.
5. Damanpour F., Aravind D. Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents // Management and Organization Review. 2012. № 8 (2). Р. 423–454.
6.
6. Liao S-H., Wu C. System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation // Expert Systems with Applications. 2010. № 37 (2). Р. 1096–1103.
7.
7. Camison C., Villar-Lopez A. An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation // International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 2010. № 30 (8). Р. 853–878.
8.
8. Karlsson C., Tavassoli S. Innovation strategies of firms: What strategies and why? // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2015. № 41 (6). Р. 1483–1506.
9.
9. Hwang H. G., Chang I., Chen F., Wu S. Investigation of the application of KMS for diseases classifications: A study in a Taiwanese hospital // Expert Systems with Applications. 2008. № 34 (1). Р. 725–733.
10.
10. Hamel G. Management innovation // Leadership Excellence. 2009. № 26 (5). Р. 5.
11.
11. Armbruster H. Bikfalvi A., Kinkel S., Lay G. Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys // Technovation. 2008. № 28. Р. 644–657.
12.
12. Damanpour F., Gopalakrishnan S. The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations // Journal of Management Studies. 2001. № 38 (1). Р. 45–65.
13.
13. Arranz N., Arroyabe M.F., Li J., De Arroyabe F. An integrated model of organisational innovation and firm performance: Generation, persistence and complementarity // Journal of Business Research. 2019. № 105. Р. 270–282.
14.
14. Gunday G., Ulusoy G. Kilic K., Alpkan L. Effects of innovation types on firm performance // International Journal of Production Economics. 2011. № 133 (2). Р. 662–676.
15.
15. Sapprasert K., Clausen T. H. Organizational innovation and its effects // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2012. № 21 (5). Р. 1283–1305.
16.
16. Camison C., Villar-Lopez A. Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance // Journal of Business Research. 2014. № 67 (1). Р. 2891–2902.
17.
17. Doran J. Are differing forms of innovation complements or substitutes? // European Journal of Innovation Management. 2012. № 15 (3). Р. 351–371.
18.
18. Ballot G., Fakhfakh F., Galia F., Salter A. The fateful triangle: Complementarities in performance between product, process and organizational innovation in France and the UK // Research Policy. 2015. № 44 (I). Р. 217–232.
19.
19. Arranz N., Arroyabe M. F., Li J., De Arroyabe F. An integrated model of organizational innovation and firm performance: Generation, persistence and complementarity // Journal of Business Research. 2019. № 105. Р. 270–282.
20.
20. Mol M. J., Birkinshaw J. The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices // Journal of Business Research. 2009. № 62 (12). Р. 1269–1280.
21.
21. Battisti G., Stoneman P. How innovative are UK firms? Evidence from the fourth UK community innovation survey on synergies between technological and organizational innovations // British Journal of Management. 2010. № 21 (1). Р. 187-–206.
22.
22. Piva M., Santarelli E., Vivarelli M. The skill bias effect of technological and organizational change: Evidence and policy implications // Research Policy. 2005. № 34. Р. 141–157.
23.
23. Birkinshaw J., Hamel G., Mol M. Management innovation // Academy of Management Review. 2008. № 33 (4). Р. 825–845.
24.
24. Azar G., Ciabuschi F. Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness // International Business Review. 2017. № 26. Р. 324–336. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.002.
25.
25. Mohnen P., Roller L. H. Complementarities in innovation policy // European Economic Review. 2005. № 49 (6). Р. 1431–1450.
26.
26. Polder M., Leeuwen G. V., Mohnen P., Raymond W. Product, process and organizational innovation: Drivers, complementarity and productivity effects // UNUMERIT Working Paper Series. 2010. № 035. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44968451_Product_Process_and_Organizational_Innovation_Drivers_Complementarity_and_Productivity_Effects
27.
27. Lam A. Organisational innovation // The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. J. Fagerberg. D. C. Mowery, R. R. Nelson (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 115–147.
28.
28. Michailova S., Zhan W. Dynamic capabilities and innovation in MNC subsidiaries // Journal of World Business. 2015. № 50 (3). Р. 576–583.
29.
29. Prajogo D. I., Sohal A. S. The integration of TQM and technology // R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega. 2006. № 34. Р. 296–312.
30.
30. Teece D. J. Business models, business strategy and innovation // Long Range Planning. 2010. № 43 (2–3). Р. 172–194.
31.
31. Danneel E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences // Strategic Management Journal. 2002. № 23 (12). Р. 1095–1121.
32.
32. Attia M. Yousfi O., Loukil N., Omri A. Do directors’ attributes influence innovation? Empirical evidence from France // International Journal of Innovation. 2020. № 28. Р. 644–657.
33.
33. Xie L. Environmental Activism in China. London, New York: Routletge, 2009. 225 p.
34.
34. Aghion P. J., Reenen V., Zingales L. Innovation and institutional ownership // American Economic Review. 2013. № 103 (1) Р. 277–304.
35.
35. Lee M. M., Kim K. K., Bau J. Are founder CEOs better innovators? Evidence from S&P500 firms // Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. 2016. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320788235_Are_Founder_CEOs_Better_Innovators_Evidence_from_SP_500_Firms
36.
36. Sheikh, S. The impact of market competition on the relation between CEO power and firm innovation // Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 2018. № 44. Р. 36–50.