Home → Releases → 2023 №1 (35) →

FEATURES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FINANCIAL POLICY IN THE FIELD OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Sectoral economics and government regulation , UDC: 336.6 DOI: 10.25688/2312-6647.2023.35.1.03

Authors

  • Skvortsov Nikita Igorevich
  • Pavlov Nikita Sergeevich
  • Ermilov Valery Georgievich PhD of Economics, Associate Professor

Annotation

The article is devoted to analysis of financial system peculiarities in context of higher education in the Russian Federation and countries of the world. The study is aimed at search of further development directions in financial policy within the framework of domestic universities support in context of their development and increase of competitiveness in the international arena. The following research methods were used: comparative analysis, synthesis, generalization, method of expert estimation. The article considers legal and institutional features of functioning in context of bureaucratic, collegial and market financial models of higher educational institutions. Assessment of financial mechanisms introduction in the field of higher education European, Asian countries, and USA, is applied. The article studies peculiarities of Russian universities financial support. It concludes that it is necessary to update financial models in the field of higher education, and to continue implementation of domestic universities comprehensive support programs in the Russian Federation, in order to meet current needs of society and market demand.
Tags:
financial models of higher education; public and private funding of higher education; efficiency of financing in higher education.

How to link insert

Skvortsov, N. I., Pavlov, N. S. & Ermilov, V. G. (2023). FEATURES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FINANCIAL POLICY IN THE FIELD OF HIGHER EDUCATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 2023 №1 (35), 37. https://doi.org/10.25688/2312-6647.2023.35.1.03
References
1. 1. Zhuk A. A. Changes in institutional arrangements for higher education: analysis of institutional complementarity // Journal of Economic Regulation. 2018. № 4. P. 205–213.
2. 2. Krohmal L. A. Improving the model of state support for higher education services in Russia // Problems of economics and law practice. 2018. № 5. P. 72–78.
3. 3. Nizov A.N., Medzhitova T.I. Foreign experience of higher education financing [Electronic resourse] // Russian Economic Internet-Journal. 2018. № 2. URL: https://www.erej.ru/Articles/2018/Nizov_Medzhitova.pdf
4. 4. Education in figures: 2021: Statistics digest / L. M. Gohberg [and others]. National Research University «Higher School of Economics». Moscow: HSE, 2021. 132 p.
5. 5. Education in numbers: 2022: Statistics digest / L. M. Gokhberg [and others]. National Research University «Higher School of Economics». Moscow: HSE, 2022. 132 p.
6. 6. Blokdyk G. Sustainable development goals: a complete guide. 5STARCooks, 2020. 309 p.
7. 7. Carpentier V. Public-private substitution in higher education: has cost-sharing gone too far? // Higher Education Quarterly. 2012. № 66 (4). P. 363–390.
8. 8. Cheslock J. J., Hughes R. P. Differences across states in higher education finance policy // Journal of Education Finance, 2011. № 36 (4). P. 369–393.
9. 9. Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en
10. 10. Lebeau Y., Stumpf R., Brown R., Lucchesi M. A. A., Kwiek M. Who shall pay for the public good? Comparative trends in the funding crisis of public higher education // Compare. 2012. № 42 (1). P. 137–157.
11. 11. Marginson S. Higher education and public good // Higher Education Quarterly. 2011. № 65. P. 411–433.
12. 12. Michael S., Kretovics M. A. Financing Higher Education in a Global Market. New York: Algora Publishing, 2008. 344 p.
13. 13. Who really bears the cost of education? How the burden of education expenditure shifts from the public to the private sector // Education Indicators in Focus. № 56. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/4c4f545b-en
14. 14. Pranevičienė B., Pūraitė A. The financing methods of higher education system [Electronic resourse] // Jurisprudence. 2010. № 4 (122). P. 335–356. URL: https://repository.mruni.eu/bitstream/handle/007/11619/document.pdf
15. 15. Schendel R., McCowan T. Expanding higher education systems in low- and middleincome countries: the challenges of equity and quality // Higher Education. 2016. № 72 (4). P. 407–411.
16. 16. Vorotnikov E. Russian HE system is highly underfunded, says Duma report [Electronic resourse] // University World News. 2020. October 01. URL: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20201001164800195
Download file .pdf 350.08 kb