Home Releases № 1 (47)

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES IN RUSSIA AND CHINA: STATE, PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

World Economy and Foreign Economic Activity , UDC: 338.45:62(470+510)(045) DOI: 10.24412/2312-6647-2026-147-31-48

Authors

  • Vlasova Marina Sergeevna PhD in Economics

Annotation

The topic of the article is relevant, since the development of high-tech industries in individual countries is a key factor in ensuring their competitiveness in the international sphere. Russia and China, having significant potential, face such problems as dependence on imported technologies, insufficient financing and low level of innovation activity, and sanctions pressure. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comparative analysis of support systems for Chinese and Russian high-tech enterprises, identify key problems and growth points for improving the situation in the countries and achieving Russia’s technological leadership on a global scale. The methodology and the leading approach to the study of the problem is based on methods of comparative analysis, analysis of the regulatory framework and expert assessments. A comprehensive methodology was used, which included the study of official statistics, international ratings, as well as consideration of regulatory legal acts and government programs of both countries. The study revealed common problems such as a shortage of qualified personnel and weak patent protection. The findings confirm the need for coordinated efforts in the field of government support and regulatory regulation to eliminate gaps in high-tech industries and achieve technological leadership.

How to link insert

Vlasova, M. S. (2027). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES IN RUSSIA AND CHINA: STATE, PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (47), 31. https://doi.org/10.24412/2312-6647-2026-147-31-48
References
1. 1. Bogachev Y. S., Trifonov P. V., Abdikeev N. M. Problems of digitalization of the Russian industry // Strategic Decisions and Risk Management. 2022. № 13 (2). Р. 151–159. DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2022-2-151-159
2. 2. McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. Investing in the IT: that makes a competitive difference // Harvard Business Rev. Boston, 2008. Vol. 86. № 7/8. P. 98–107.
3. 3. Götz М., Jankowska B. Adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies and company competitiveness: case studies from a post-transition economy // Foresight and STI Governance. 2020. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 61–78. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.61.78
4. 4. Ghobakhloo M. Industry 4.0, Digitization, and opportunities for sustainability // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 252. № 10. Аrticle 119869. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869
5. 5. Leont`ev D. V. Vlijanie sankcionnyh ogranichenij na dinamiku resursnogo potenciala vysokotehnologichnyh otraslej promyshlennosti // Innovacionnaja jekonomika: perspektivy razvitija i sovershenstvovanija. 2025. № 1 (83). S. 42–45.
6. 6. Avdeeva O. A. E`ksport vy`sokotexnologichnoj produkcii Kitaya v 2000–2020 gg. // Voprosy` e`konomiki. 2022. № 6. S. 126–143. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-6-126-143
7. 7. Dong K. Y., Taghizadeh-Hesary F., Zhao J. How inclusive financial development eradicates energy poverty in China? The role of technological innovation // Energy Economics. 2022. Vol. 109. 106007. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106007
8. 8. Towards sustainable development: The role of directors` international orientation and their diversity for non-financial disclosure / D. Dobija [at al.] // Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2022. Vol. 30. № 1. Р. 66–90. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2339
9. 9. Gold N. O., Taib F. M., Ma Y. Firm-level attributes, industry-specific factors, stakeholder pressure, and country-level attributes: Global evidence of what inspires corporate sustainability practices and performance // Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. № 20. Аrticle 13222. DOI: 10.3390/su142013222
Download file .pdf 350.18 kb