Home Releases № 1 (39)

ANALYSIS OF THE CONSEQUENCES AND CHANNELS OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE RICOCHET EFFECT ON THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR

Topic of the Issue , UDC: 338.45 DOI: 10.25688/2312-6647.2024.39.1.01

Authors

  • Bakaev Anatoly Alexandrovich Doctor of Historical Sciences, PhD in Law
  • Matraeva Lilia Valerievna Doctor of Economics, Professor
  • Vasyutina Ekaterina Sergeevna PhD in Economics, Associate Professor

Annotation

Currently, more than a third of the world’s energy consumption is in the industrial sector, so the search for energy efficiency technologies is one of the fastest growing trends in the modern world. The need and the extreme importance of their dissemination and improvement is emphasized at the international level, since they are assigned a key role in reorienting existing economic practices towards sustainable “green” growth, the key direction of which is the conservation and rational use of natural resources. In recent years, research has increasingly focused on the phenomenon of the rebound effect as a risk in implementing energy efficiency policies. Research shows that the size of the rebound effect, i.e. an increase in energy consumption as a result of a decrease in its specific consumption, in certain cases may exceed 100 %. Therefore, its consideration is an important factor in the implementation of forecasting and development of energy saving and energy efficiency programs in the industrial sector. The article systematizes classification approaches to the manifestation of the ricochet effect, and also presents the author’s vision of this classification. Based on empirical studies of the experience of other countries, estimates of the combined direct and indirect rebound effect for the industrial sector are systematized and generalized and the specifics of its manifestation are revealed.

How to link insert

Bakaev, A. A., Matraeva, L. V. & Vasyutina, E. S. (2024). ANALYSIS OF THE CONSEQUENCES AND CHANNELS OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE RICOCHET EFFECT ON THE INDUSTRIAL SECTOR Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (39), 8. https://doi.org/10.25688/2312-6647.2024.39.1.01
References
1. 1. Innovation in education. Socio-economic justification for the use of virtual educational environments / S. V. Veretekhina, Yu. P. Kozhaev, E. A. Kuznetsova, O. V. Shinkareva // Scientific research and development. Economics. 2017. T. 5. № 3. P. 21–26.
2. 2. Klochkov V. V., Ratner S. V. Management of the development of “green” technologies: economic aspects: monograph / Institute of Problems of Management named after V. A. Trapeznikov Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: IPU RAS, 2013. 292 p.
3. 3. Clark B., Foster J. B. William Stanley Jevons and “The coal question”: An Introduction to Jevons’s “Of the Economy of Fuel” // Organization & Environment. 2001. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 93–98.
4. 4. Chan N. W., Gillingham K. The Microeconomic Theory of the Rebound Effect and Its Welfare Implications // Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. 2015. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 133–159.
5. 5. Brooke L. Energy efficiency fallacies revisited // Energy Policy. 2000. Vol. 28. № 6–7. P. 355–366.
6. 6. Khazzoom D. J. Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances // The Energy Journal. 1980. Vol. 1. № 4. P. 21–40.
7. 7. Saunders H. D. The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and neoclassical growth // The Energy Journal. 1992. Vol. 13(4). P. 131–148.
8. 8. Bulus A., Topalli N. Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effect: Does Energy Efficiency Save Energy? // Energy and Power Engineering. 2011. № 3. P. 355–360.
9. 9. Mogilenko A. V. Rebound effect as a deterioration in the result of energy-saving measures compared to the expected // Energy security and energy conservation. 2016. № 5. Р. 17–21.
10. 10. Sorrell S., Gatersleben B., Druckman A. The limits of energy sufficiency: A review of the evidence for rebound effects and negative spillovers from behavioural change // Energy Research & Social Science. 2020. Vol. 64. P. 1–17.
11. 11. Mogilenko A. V. Implementation of resource- and energy-saving measures. Structure and examples of manifestations of the rebound effect // Energy saving. 2018. № 7. URL: https://www.abok.ru/for_spec/articles.php?nid=7034
12. 12. Lange S. [et al.]. Economy-Wide Rebound Effects: State of the art, a new taxonomy, policy and research gaps. Discussion Paper. Berlin: ReСap, 2019. 42 p. // ResearchGate. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333114838_Economy-Wide_Rebound_Effects_State_of_the_art_a_new_taxonomy_policy_and_research_gaps
13. 13. North D.C. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press, 2005. 187 p.
14. 14. Polterovich V. M. Institutional traps and economic reforms. Moscow: CEMI RAS and NES, 1999. 37 p.
15. 15. Matraeva L. [et al.]. Identifying rebound effects and formulating more sustainable energy efficiency policy: a global review and framework // Energy Research and Social Science. 2022. Vol. 85. P. 102–402.
16. 16. Lin B., Li J. The rebound effect for heavy industry: Empirical evidence from China // Energy Policy. 2014. Vol. 74. P. 589–599.
17. 17. Wang H., Zhou P., Zhou D. Q. An empirical study of direct rebound effect for passenger transport in urban China // Energy Economics. 2012. Vol. 34. № 2. P. 452–460.
18. 18. Bentzen J. Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption // Energy Economics. 2004. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 123–134.
19. 19. Amjadi G., Lundgren T., Persson L. The Rebound Effect in Swedish Heavy Industry // Energy Economics. 2018. Vol. 71. P. 140–148.
Download file .pdf 390.58 kb